Topic: Commercial Bank Management Branch Management
Characters: Chris, Management Trainee at Commerce Trust Bank Carole Baker, Teller at Commerce Trust
Chris wasn’t really pleased with his current assignment as a relief branch manager at Commerce Trust Bank, but it was a means to an end. Employed by the bank for almost two years as a branch management trainee, Chris desperately wanted to escape the training program and begin a career as branch manager. He had earned strong praise from his superiors throughout the training program, and Chris hoped this last phase of training would pass quickly and uneventfully.
As a relief manager, Chris took over all management functions in various Commerce Trust retail branches whenever the regular office managers were called out of town for more than one day. The relief manager’s position was particularly challenging, because Chris was called upon regularly to make quick decisions regarding check cashing, small loan approval, and employee supervision when he knew few of the regular branch customers and little about the daily office routines. For assistance, Chris often relied on the judgment and experience of the senior tellers and customer service representatives within each office he managed.
One recent assignment was particularly difficult because Chris was called to work in a small suburban office staffed by relatively inexperienced branch employees. At the end of his first full day in the office, Chris was not surprised when one of the branch’s young tellers, Carole Baker, reported to him that her drive-in teller window was $900 short. While Chris was accustomed to out-of-balance teller windows, Carole was not. She had just completed teller school the week before Chris’s arrival at the branch, and as a probationary employee, she knew that an unresolved $900 shortage would lead to the termination of her employment with the bank. When Carole approached Chris for help, she was in a state of panic
Given his experience in retail banking, Chris reassured Carole that he would locate the $900 shortage from the transactions ledger maintained by Carole’s computerized teller terminal. Sure enough, after reviewing Carole’s ledger entries for only a few minutes, Chris spotted the error. Carole had received a check for $100 from one of the bank’s regular depositors, incorrectly entered it into the computer for $1,000, and paid out $900 more in cash than the amount shown on the check.
Both Carole and Chris were relieved to locate the error, and even more relieved that one of the branch’s best deposit customers was the unexpected beneficiary of Carole’s error. Surely the customer pulled away from the drive-in window without realizing the mistake. When Chris phoned the customer to explain the bank’s error, however, he was shocked when the customer reported receiving only $100 from Carole’s window. Even when Chris mentioned that Carole would lose her job if the error could not be resolved, the customer steadfastly maintained that Carole had only paid $100 in exchange for the $100 check.
Hanging up the phone, Chris turned toward Carole, who was now in tears. In order to reconcile her window, Chris would have to report the $900 error on Carole’s shortage report. While the source of the mistake was clear to everyone at the branch, the loss appeared unrecoverable. When Chris reported the shortage to the bank’s personnel department, as he was required to do by the bank’s branch operations policy, Carole would be fired. Wasn’t there something he could do, Carole sobbed, to balance her window without reporting the
$900 loss? What should Chris do now?
It occurred to him that since the customer who took the money maintained some accounts with the bank, he could debit one of the customer’s accounts for the $900. Alternatively, he could place the $900 loss in a temporary suspense account to balance Carole’s window and resolve the issue at a later date. Chris was unsure whether to take one of these options or perhaps do something else.
Author:
D. Anthony Plath, Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
What Are the Relevant Facts?
As a relief branch manager, Chris works in a variety of retail bank offices where he is unfamiliar with local bank customers, employees, and daily office routines.
Chris makes branch policy decisions concerning check cashing, loan approval, and employee supervision in the absence of the regular branch managers.
Chris often relies on the knowledge and experience of local branch personnel to gain information when making management decisions.
Carole, a new drive-in teller at a branch under Chris’s management, faces a $900 shortage in reconciling her teller window.
Chris is able to trace the source of Carole’s error to a $100 check cashed for $1000, but the recipient of the $1,000–a regular depositor at the branch– reports receiving only $100 from Carole.
If Chris reports the loss on Carole’s shortage report, she will be fired.
The bank’s branch operations policy requires Chris to report the loss on Carole’s shortage report.
What Are the Ethical Issues?
How can Chris help Carole salvage her job with the bank and act in accordance with the bank’s branch operations policy?
How can Chris question the honesty of a long-standing branch customer when he is unable to prove Carole’s mistake by actually counting the cash received by the customer?
Should Carole be forced to give up her job because the bank’s customer is dishonest?
How can Chris be sure that Carols is telling the truth?
Who Are the Primary Stakeholders?
Chris
Carole
All retail and commercial depositors at Commerce Trust
Senior bank officers at Commerce Trust who set and enforce the bank’s branch operations
Other branch managers and tellers at Commerce Trust who must conform to the bank’s branch operations
What Are the Possible Alternatives?
Chris could ignore Carole’s plea for help and report the $900 loss in her shortage report.
Chris could contact the depositor by telephone or in person in a second attempt to recover the $900.
Chris could place the $900 loss in a temporary suspense account at the branch to balance Carole’s window for the evening and resolve the issue at a later date.
Chris could debit one of the depositor’s accounts with Commerce Trust (assuming the customer maintained deposits with the bank in excess of $900 and face the consequences of an angry
What Are the Ethics of the Alternatives?
Questioning the class based on a “utilitarian” perspective (i.e., costs and benefits):
Which possible alternative provides the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people? Be sure to point out that Chris’s violation of the branch shortage policy affects not just Carole, but all other tellers within the Commerce Trust branch )
How can the costs of the error be measured? Should these costs include the training expense associated with replacing Carole, given that the bank decides to terminate her employment? If Chris decides to question the depositor’s honesty in this transaction, should these costs include the possible damage to Chris’s career if the depositor becomes angry and reports Chris’s action to his supervisors? If Chris decides to debit the depositor’s account(s) with Commerce Trust, should these costs include the lost customer satisfaction with the bank, and should the benefits include the loss of an dishonest customer by the bank?
Do the benefits associated with maintaining good customer relations offset the costs of sacrificing a new employee who made an honest mistake?
Questioning the class based on a “rights” perspective:
What does each stakeholder have the right to expect in this case? Does Carole have the right to expect support from Chris? If so, how much support should she expect? Does Chris have the right to expect honesty from the bank’s deposit customers? Do the bank’s senior managers have the right to expect that Chris (and other bank employees) will always act in accordance with the bank’s shortage policy?
Are the rights of some stakeholders more important than the rights of others? If so, whose rights are most important in this case, and whose rights are least important? Why?
Which alternative course of action violates the rights of the greatest number of stakeholders in the case? Which course of action compromises the rights of the fewest number of stakeholders?
Questioning the class based on a “justice” perspective (i.e., benefits and burdens):
Which alternative course of action distributes the benefits and burdens most fairly among the stakeholders? Which course of action results in the most inequitable distribution of benefits and burdens?
What are the benefits and burdens associated with Carole’s termination, and how do these benefits and burdens compare with the consequences of questioning the depositor’s honesty? Do Chris and Carole share equally in the benefits and burdens associated with this case, or do they bear a disproportionate
Responsibility in exchange for minima benefits?
What Are the Practical Constraints?
The case indicates that Chris quickly attributed the shortage to a single transaction, yet the customer denies receiving $1,000. Perhaps the depositor is correct, and Chris should continue his audit of Carole’s transaction ledger to locate other possible errors. After all, Carole is a new teller, and the
$900 shortage may be the product of many errors she made throughout the day.
The case implicitly assumes Carole’s honesty in reporting her error to Chris. However, Carole may be a dishonest bank employee who is attempting to exploit Chris’s inexperience at the branch and embezzle $900 from the bank.
The case does not reveal the total value of deposit accounts the apparently dishonest customer maintains with the branch. If this figure is substantial, it would have a material impact on Chris’s managerial decision.
What Actions Should Be Taken?
What course of action should Chris take?
Which alternative would you choose if you were in his position? Why would you make that choice?
Are there any additional facts you would like to know about the case before you make a particular decision?
If so, what are these facts, and why are they important to your decision process?
Which ethical theories (utilitarian, rights, or justice) make the most sense to you as they relate to this situation. Why?
